WorkChoices, Afghanistan and climate change take centre stage

Today, the National Archives of Australia (NAA) released a key selection of records of the Australian Cabinet and its National Security Committee from 2005.

The election in October 2004 had given the Howard government a commanding majority ^[1] in the House of Representatives. From July 2005, it also obtained control of the Senate^[2], a rare accomplishment for any Australian government.

Freedom from having to negotiate with the Senate cross bench on legislation emboldened the cabinet in several directions. Most significant was the government’s plan to initiate the comprehensive reform of Australia’s industrial relations laws.

Introduction on WorkChoices

In March 2005, Cabinet agreed with suggested reforms that would encourage a more direct relationship between employers and employees. The reform package approved by Cabinet sought to replace separate state and federal industrial relations systems with a unified national system. It was known as WorkChoices and, once passed, the act would come into effect on March 27 2006.

The new system dispensed with unfair dismissal laws for companies under a certain size. It also replaced the “no disadvantage test” (NDT), a provision that required workers be no worse off under new enterprise agreements as compared to any relevant law or award. This was superseded by a more limited safety net of five conditions that could be bargained away. The new system also restricted trade union power by limiting workers’ ability to strike and allowing them to bargain for conditions without collectivised representation.

The new industrial relations laws sparked a major campaign of resistance. Defence of employees’ rights was led by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU). The ACTU’s “Your Rights at Work” campaign would play a significant role^[3] in the Howard government’s defeat in 2007.

Security and regional issues

Industrial relations reform was the key issue for the remainder of Howard’s fourth term. But security and regional issues continued to be important.

The tsunami that devastated countries in the Indian Ocean region in December 2004 killed 290,000 people and displaced more than one million. Howard attended a Special Leaders’ Meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on January 6 2005. There he promised that Australia would “do its bit” towards regional efforts to establish a tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean.

Indonesia had a pressing need for reconstruction assistance. By providing such assistance, Australia was presented with a unique opportunity to improve a relationship with Indonesia^[4] soured by East Timor’s winning of independence in 2002.

Cabinet reached the decision in February 2005 to provide $1 billion for relief and rehabilitation, with a focus^[5] on Sumatra. Later, in June 2005, it agreed to recommendations by Minister for Foreign Affairs Alexander Downer to extend cooperation with Indonesia in defence and combating terrorism and people-smuggling.

2005 was a critical year for the extension of Australia’s commitment in Afghanistan. Australia had made a military contribution to US-led operations in Afghanistan in 2001-02 through the deployment of Special Air Service (SAS) elements. But in 2002, the SAS Task Force was withdrawn^[6].

By 2004, with the Taliban resurgent, the US Central Command was requesting a further contribution of Australian special forces to the US-led Operation Enduring Freedom. Defence Minister Robert Hill advised Cabinet that a further Australian contribution in Afghanistan “may enhance our already strong relationships with the US and the United Kingdom, and develop our relationship with NATO”.

The National Security Committee agreed to Hill’s submission to deploy a Special Forces Task Group within the Combined Forces Command – Afghanistan. The SAS would stay in Afghanistan until 2021 in what became^[7] 20 rotations involving 3,000 personnel.

Australia’s close relationship with Japan had much to do with the Cabinet agreeing in 2005 to an Australian military contingent providing a secure environment for the Japanese Iraq Reconstruction and Support Group, which was operating in the Al Muthanna province in southern Iraq.

The increasing tempo of the insurgency in Iraq was highlighted in May 2005, when Australian engineer Douglas Wood was kidnapped^[8]. Howard insisted Australia would neither pull troops out of Iraq nor pay ransom. Six weeks later, Wood was rescued by Iraqi troops with US assistance.

By the following year, Iraq would be on the brink of collapse^[9] and the United States contemplating pulling out^[10]. As the Iraq War became increasingly unpopular, the Howard government would have to confront evidence of the payment of bribes^[11] to the Iraqi government by Australian wheat trader AWB.

Closer to home, Cabinet monitored the regional commitment in the Solomon Islands, its plan to bolster the effectiveness of government in Papua New Guinea and political instability in Fiji ^[12].

Climate change

In 2025, the Liberal and National parties agreed formally to abandon^[13] the net zero by 2050 climate target.

But 20 years earlier, in 2005, Downer and Environment minister Ian Campbell had warned Cabinet of the baleful consequences for Australia of climate change and the imperative for concerted international action.

The concerns raised by the two ministers contributed to Howard’s proposing an emissions trading scheme^[14] on the eve of the 2007 election. However, rather than ending the climate wars, this merely presaged their continuation without end

Read more: Climate wars, carbon taxes and toppled leaders: the 30-year history of Australia’s climate response, in brief^[15]

WorkChoices brings Howard unstuck

Howard’s WorkChoices reforms of 2005 were hugely controversial, and continued to dog Liberal ministers for years afterwards. So potent were they that Howard not only lost the 2007 federal election, but his long-held seat of Bennelong too.

References

1. ^{^} a commanding majority (theconversation.com)
2. ^{^} control of the Senate (www.theage.com.au)
3. ^{^} a significant role (www.ianwatson.com.au)
4. ^{^} relationship with Indonesia (www.naa.gov.au)
5. ^{^} with a focus (www.dfat.gov.au)
6. ^{^} was withdrawn (www.aph.gov.au)
7. ^{^} in what became (www.lowyinstitute.org)
8. ^{^} was kidnapped (www.aph.gov.au)
9. ^{^} brink of collapse (www.arabnews.com)
10. ^{^} pulling out (www.smh.com.au)
11. ^{^} payment of bribes (www.abc.net.au)
12. ^{^} political instability in Fiji (reporter.anu.edu.au)
13. ^{^} to abandon (www.abc.net.au)
14. ^{^} emissions trading scheme (www.abc.net.au)
15. ^{^} Climate wars, carbon taxes and toppled leaders: the 30-year history of Australia’s climate response, in brief (theconversation.com)