do 300,000 Kiwis really believe Canada is building an army of mutant super-raccoons?
- Written by John Kerr, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Public Health, University of Otago
Four percent of Americans – roughly 12 million people – believe[1] that “lizard people” secretly control the Earth. At least, that was the finding of an infamous 2013 public opinion survey[2].
Do so many people really believe such outlandish claims? Or do results like these partly reflect people giving silly answers or deliberately skewing surveys for fun?
US psychiatrist Alexander Scott believes the latter plays a significant role.
Using the survey as an example, he coined the term “the Lizardman constant[3]” to describe the idea that a certain amount of noise and trolling[4] will always exist in surveys about unusual beliefs.
As Scott warned: “Any possible source of noise – jokesters, cognitive biases, or deliberate misbehaviour – can easily overwhelm the signal.”
As researchers who study uncommon beliefs such as conspiracy theories, we wanted to investigate how this kind of cheeky trolling can muddy the waters.
Trolls and true believers
Building on earlier Australian research[5], we surveyed[6] New Zealanders to test how common dishonest or joking responses were in conspiracy theory surveys.
We did this in two ways. First, we directly asked people a yes/no question at the end of the survey:
“Did you respond insincerely at any earlier point in this survey? In other words, did you give any responses that were actually just joking, trolling, or otherwise not indicating what you really think?”
Second, we included in the survey a “conspiracy theory” so ridiculous we could assume most, if not all, people who said they believed it were taking the mickey.
We asked them if they believed:
The Canadian Armed Forces have been secretly developing an elite army of genetically engineered, super intelligent, giant raccoons to invade nearby countries.
In our representative online sample of 810 New Zealanders, 8.3% of respondents confessed to being insincere in the survey.
Another 7.2% said they thought the Canadian raccoon army theory was probably or definitely true. That proportion – similar to findings from Australia[7] – would equate to more than 300,000 adult New Zealanders.
To complicate things slightly, there was some overlap between those admitting to insincere answers and those claiming to believe the raccoon conspiracy. Combined, 13.3% of respondents fell into one or both groups – roughly one in eight people not appearing to take the survey seriously.
Importantly, these respondents were also much more likely to endorse other conspiracy theories, inflating estimates of how widespread those beliefs really are.
For instance, 6.5% of the full sample endorsed the claim that governments around the world are covering up the fact that 5G mobile networks spread coronavirus[8].
But once we removed the insincere responders, that figure dropped by more than half to 2.7%.
Across 13 different conspiracy theories, the estimated proportion of believers fell substantially once those respondents were excluded.
Another interesting insight from our study was that people endorsing contradictory conspiracy theories were much more likely to show signs of responding insincerely.
Previous studies have found some people appear to believe conspiracy theories that directly contradict each other[9]. In our survey, for example, some participants agreed both that COVID-19 is a myth and that governments are covering up the fact that 5G networks spread the virus.
But nearly three-quarters of those respondents also showed signs of joking or dishonest answers.
This suggests genuinely believing contradictory conspiracy theories may be less common than previously thought.
Not every conspiracy believer is joking
Our findings add further weight to the idea that surveys may overestimate how many people truly believe some conspiracy theories – thanks, in part, to trolls.
But does that mean all conspiracy theory research is bunk?
Fortunately not. Most research in this area is not focused on counting conspiracy believers, but on understanding why people hold these beliefs and what effects they can have.
We tested several well-established findings from earlier conspiracy theory research to see whether they still held up once insincere respondents were removed from the data.
For example, previous studies have found[10] that people who endorse conspiracy theories are more likely to see the world as a dangerous and threatening place.
We found the same pattern. In fact, removing insincere respondents made little difference to the broader relationships identified in earlier research.
Nevertheless, we recommend that future surveys include ways to gauge whether respondents are answering sincerely and account for this in the analysis. At the very least, researchers should acknowledge that trolls and joking responses can distort their results.
While our research suggests some people are taking the mickey in surveys, it also shows a significant minority genuinely appear to believe some of these claims.
In some cases – such as believing authorities are covering up the fact that the Earth is flat – this may be relatively harmless. But other conspiracy beliefs can lead to real-world harm[11].
Good-quality research is essential for understanding how sincere believers end up down these rabbit holes, and how those beliefs influence real-world behaviour.
Research into why people embrace conspiracy theories – and the real-world consequences of those beliefs – remains important.
But when surveys suggest millions may believe in lizard overlords or genetically engineered raccoon armies, it is also worth remembering the “Lizardman constant”: some respondents may simply be having us on.
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Rob Ross, Mathew Ling and Stephen Hill to this article.
References
- ^ believe (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ an infamous 2013 public opinion survey (www.publicpolicypolling.com)
- ^ the Lizardman constant (slatestarcodex.com)
- ^ trolling (theconversation.com)
- ^ earlier Australian research (online.ucpress.edu)
- ^ we surveyed (royalsocietypublishing.org)
- ^ findings from Australia (online.ucpress.edu)
- ^ 5G mobile networks spread coronavirus (theconversation.com)
- ^ directly contradict each other (journals.sagepub.com)
- ^ have found (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- ^ can lead to real-world harm (www.sciencedirect.com)
Authors: John Kerr, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Public Health, University of Otago
