Bus seatbelts can save lives. How do we get more people to wear them?

The recent Stonehaven school bus rollover^[1] in Victoria, in which 12-year-old Milla Killeen was killed and many others were injured, reminds us that bus crashes, though uncommon, can have devastating consequences.

In 2023 alone, ten people were killed in the Hunter Valley wedding bus crash^[2] in New South Wales. In a separate crash, 18 school children were hospitalised^[3] after a truck collided with their bus near Melbourne.

When it comes to road safety, seatbelts are one of the most effective interventions^[4] ever introduced. They have saved thousands of lives by reducing the severity of crashes for drivers and passengers. Compliance in cars in Australia is now nearly universal.

But this habit does not extend as strongly to buses, even when seatbelts are fitted. This is despite evidence showing^[5] bus seatbelts are also highly effective.

So what are the laws around bus seatbelts in Australia? And how do we ensure people use them?

Bus versus car crashes

Buses account for a very small share of road fatalities in Australia^[6].

Over the decade from 2014–2023, bus crashes made up approximately 1.6% of all fatal road crashes, averaging 17 fatal crashes per year, with only around four bus occupant deaths annually.

Bus occupants made up less than 1% of all fatalities or hospitalisations in road crashes.

Buses are generally safe because their size and mass offer greater protection in collisions. They are usually driven by professional and well-trained drivers, and many services operate on predictable, lower-risk routes.

However, when severe crashes do occur – such as rollovers or high-speed collisions – the consequences can be particularly serious.

Large numbers of passengers may be involved at once, many may not be restrained by seatbelts, and evacuation can be difficult, especially for children or older passengers.

Are bus seatbelts effective?

Seatbelts in cars are designed for smaller vehicles that decelerate and crash differently to large buses.

In cars, belts are critical because occupants are close to rigid structures^[7] and are at high risk of being thrown forward, even in moderate collisions^[8].

That is why wearing rates are near-universal and their effectiveness is beyond doubt^[9].

Buses are heavier and sit higher off the ground. Most bus crashes are low-speed incidents where injuries are minor.

But in less common high-speed collisions and rollovers, the risks rise sharply.

In these situations, seatbelts on buses serve a similar function to those in cars. They reduce the chance of ejection, protect against secondary impacts inside the cabin and limit pileups of unrestrained passengers.

Crash simulation studies back this up. In one rollover test of a 13-metre coach^[10], researchers compared unrestrained passengers with those using two-point and three-point belts.

Unbelted occupants faced a high risk of serious head and neck injury, while both belt types offered strong protection.

The study concluded that fitting at least two-point belts across all seats would markedly improve safety in rollover events.

The laws on bus seatbelts

National road rules say that if a bus has seatbelts, passengers must wear them^[11].

Where states differ is in how far responsibility extends to the bus driver.

There are strict rules in New South Wales, where drivers are expected to instruct passengers to wear seatbelts. Bus companies can be fined if children are unrestrained.

Western Australia goes further by mandating lap-sash belts on all school buses.

In most other jurisdictions, the obligation rests almost entirely with passengers, and drivers are not expected to monitor or enforce use.

Tasmania is an outlier in still not requiring all school buses to be fitted with seatbelts.

From November 2026, new federal design rules^[12] will require all new buses and coaches sold in Australia to be fitted with seatbelts and seatbelt reminder systems. Existing models built new must comply from November 2027.

Why don’t people wear them?

Seatbelts are only as effective as the extent to which passengers actually use them. The evidence is clear: installing belts on buses does not automatically translate into high compliance^[13].

According to an older Australian trial^[14], observed wearing rates can be as low as 14%, with averages closer to 45%.

This is largely backed up by international evidence^[15] too.

Research has shown that, for young people, the perception of severity^[16] is what motivates them to wear seatbelts. If they believe crashes can be serious, they are more likely to comply.

For adults, it is the perception of benefits that matters most: believing belts will actually help.

Across all groups, perceived barriers such as discomfort, inconvenience or fear of being trapped work against compliance.