So-called ‘clutch’ athletes might be more hype than nerveless match-winners
- Written by Ger Post, Lecturer Neuroscience, PhD student collaborative reasoning, The University of Melbourne
With the AFL finals approaching, discussions about the league’s clutch players – those who excel under pressure[1] – will soon appear[2] in the media and be debated among fans.
Last year, Gold Coast captain Noah Anderson was ranked highest[3] in a list of AFL clutch players, followed by more established names including the Western Bulldogs’ Tom Liberatore and Geelong’s Patrick Dangerfield.
But what does clutch really mean and is it possible for athletes to be “clutch”?
Noah Anderson enhanced his reputation as a so-called clutch player with a match-winning effort against Collingwood.The power of labels and narratives
While most people struggle when the pressure rises – they may even “choke[4]”, where they lose the ability to perform a skill in front of an audience – clutch players seem to excel in these circumstances.
They thrive when the heat is on and seem to save something special for these moments.
The label of being a clutch player is often shaped by stereotypical narratives of, as some media commentary has put it, “hardened, stubborn men[5]” who will “take themselves to the next level through sheer guts and an iron will[6]”.
In 2018, former Port Adelaide great and outspoken media pundit Kane Cornes earmarked[7] Bulldogs champion Marcus Bontempelli as a clutch player:
The one player who I want with the ball in their hands, when the game is on the line is “The Bont”. For me, Marcus Bontempelli, is right now the best clutch performer in the competition.
More recently, Carlton’s Blake Acres was described as “intense, desperate and completely unwilling to give an inch”[8] in the finals:
Acres was the big moment player, full of desperation, intensity and a relentless attack on the ball.
But are these players really clutch?
Blindspots and biases
These character sketches and rankings of clutch players mask many blind spots and biases[9] in how the data are compiled and interpreted.
For example, the data tend to favour players who generate impact with eye-catching and easily measurable actions (such as Bontempelli, who often brilliantly takes marks and kicks goals) while undervaluing those who do the less glamorous grunt work that helps the rest of the team (such as Liberatore, who plays a more selfless role).
More importantly, the data don’t reflect whether a player actually improves under pressure (the definition of clutch).
In the case of Anderson, is he indeed performing better than others in the final quarters of tight games? Or is he just more talented than others and ranks higher in all quarters of games?
Or maybe he is better in the first three quarters of the game and then declines in the fourth quarter – yet he is he still better than the rest?
We don’t know solely from assessing his performances in final quarters.
Studies from other team sports including basketball[10], soccer[11] and baseball[12] cannot definitely prove players excel under pressure.
No one saves something special for when it’s needed most.
It seems more likely that clutch performances simply stick in our memories: game-deciding moments are more memorable than efforts that fail to seal victory.
There could be other reasons, too.
The power of opportunity
Statistics from many sports show even if athletes are involved in more goals or baskets when the game is on the line, it doesn’t necessarily mean they excel in these moments.
When late-game performances by basketball legends including LeBron James and Kobe Bryant were analysed, another option surfaced[13]: clutch performers seem to be doing more instead of better in the last minutes of tight games.
Their scoring accuracy doesn’t improve in these moments (they miss, on average, just as much as most players) but they do get more scoring opportunities.
These opportunities are created by many involved, not in the least the teammates who pass the ball to the clutch player.
These teammates often follow the instructions from their coaches to get the clutch player in scoring position in the dying seconds.
Opponents can, unintentionally, assist by making more fouls on clutch players when the heat is on, giving them more free throws to seal the victory.
Finally, there are fans and pundits who label these players as the ones who should decide the game.
So to get more opportunities to decide a match, an athlete needs to build a reputation that they will take themselves “to the next level” when it matters most. Tattooing “CHOSEN1” on your back might help build these reputations, as LeBron James did.
Even better is when others talk about your confidence, hunger for victories, or hardened, stubborn competitiveness. This signals to fans, teammates and coaches that you are the one who should be getting the ball to decide the game.
More opportunities means more game-winning shots, which reinforces the idea you are a clutch player.
Being listed as one of the most clutch players of the competition might be the best assist an athlete can get to decide a final.
References
- ^ excel under pressure (www.sciencedirect.com)
- ^ soon appear (www.espn.com.au)
- ^ ranked highest (www.sen.com.au)
- ^ choke (hbr.org)
- ^ hardened, stubborn men (www.theage.com.au)
- ^ sheer guts and an iron will (themongrelpunt.com)
- ^ earmarked (archive.sen.com.au)
- ^ intense, desperate and completely unwilling to give an inch” (themongrelpunt.com)
- ^ many blind spots and biases (s.afl.com.au)
- ^ basketball (doi.org)
- ^ soccer (www.iza.org)
- ^ baseball (sabr.org)
- ^ another option surfaced (doi.org)
Authors: Ger Post, Lecturer Neuroscience, PhD student collaborative reasoning, The University of Melbourne
